Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis; February 2001; v. 1; no. 1; p. 61-70
© 2001 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perry, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Regular Article

Modelling rock–water interactions in flooded underground coal mines, Northern Appalachian Basin

Eric F. Perry

1 West Virginia University and US Dept of Interior, Office of Surface Mining 3 Parkway Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (e-mail: eperry{at}osmre.gov)

Inverse geochemical modelling was used to investigate rock–water interactions in flooded underground coal mines in northern Appalachia, USA. In early flooding, Pittsburgh seam mine waters are usually acidic (c. pH 3), with dissolved metals Fe and Al ranging from 10 to >100 mg l–1. Within a few decades, however, waters in fully flooded mines usually have pH of about 7 S.U., and alkalinity >300 mg l–1 CaCO3 Eq. Eh shifts from oxidizing (c. 500 to 700 mv) to reduced (–100 to –200 mv) conditions. Sodium concentrations may increase an order of magnitude; sulphate and iron concentrations may also increase. Water samples were collected from several mine-pools in West Virginia and Pennsylvania. A conceptual model was developed based on quantitative hydrology, mine-pool chemistry, mining conditions and mineralogy. The model was tested with the geochemical code PHREEQC. Simulations included mixing recharge and acid mine waters, precipitation–dissolution reactions involving carbonates, sulphates, oxy-hydroxides and sulphides, and ion adsorption and exchange. Na exchange was a dominant process in all models. Carbonates are orders of magnitude undersaturated in the juvenile mine-pool, but near saturation in the mature mine-pool, suggesting they are a primary source of acid neutralization and alkalinity. The mature mine-pool is simultaneously near equilibrium with iron sulphide, iron carbonate and iron oxy-hydroxide mineral phases. The rapid change in mine-pool water quality has substantial implications for management of these systems. Corresponding author eperry@osmre.gov

KEYWORDS: mine-pool, acid drainage, Pittsburgh seam, neutralization, inverse model, ion exchange, sulphate salts




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. B. Rees, R. J. Bowell, and I. Wiseman
Influence of mine hydrogeology on mine water discharge chemistry
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2002; 198(1): 379 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London