Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thomas, M. A. Articles by Flegal, A. R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Mercury contamination from historic mining in water and sediment, Guadalupe River and San Francisco Bay, California

¹ Department of Environmental Toxicology, WIGS Laboratory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
² Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
³ United States Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
⁴ California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400, Oakland, CA 94612, USA

The New Almaden mercury mines in California (USA), which collectively represent the largest historic producers of mercury in North America, are a persistent source of mercury contamination to the San Francisco Bay estuary. An estimate based on total mercury concentration (Hg_TOT) and provisional stream flow data measured at a gauging station in the Guadalupe River during base flow conditions yields a base flow flux of 30 g of mercury for the month of October 2000. In contrast to this base flow estimate, one 2-day rain event in October 2000 resulted in a flux of 22 g of mercury past this site. An estimate of mercury transport from the entire Guadalupe River watershed based on a sediment transport model and our measured suspended particulate Hg_TOT (0.5–4 µg g^–1) results in a total of 4–30 kg year^–1 transported to the southern reach of the estuary. Sediments in the southern reach have lower Hg_TOT (most 0.4 µg g^–1 dry wt) and monomethylmercury (MMHg, c. 1 ng g^–1 dry wt) concentrations than those in the Guadalupe River (Hg_TOT, 0.41–33 µg g^–1 dry wt; MMHg, 1–10 ng g^–1 dry wt). Because the most elevated methylmercury concentrations (8–12 ng g^–1 dry wt) were found in sediments deposited immediately upstream of hydraulic structures (e.g. diversion dams and weirs) within the river, it is proposed that such physical structures may represent important zones of MMHg production and fluxes to San Francisco Bay.

KEYWORDS: mercury, methylmercury, water, sediment, Guadalupe River, San Francisco Bay, estuaries