Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Polito, P. Articles by Oates, C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Application of sulphur isotopes to discriminate Cu–Zn VHMS mineralization from barren Fe sulphide mineralization in the greenschist to granulite facies Flin Flon–Snow Lake–Hargrave River region, Manitoba, Canada

¹ Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada (e-mail PaulPolito@angloamerican.com.au)
² Current address: Anglo American Exploration (Australia), PO Box 1067, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia
³ ioGlobal, PO Box 1425, West Perth, WA 6872, Australia
⁴ Cook Geochemical Consulting, 5-3341 Mary Anne Crescent, Victoria, BC, V9C 3S7, Canada
⁵ Anglo American plc, 20 Carlton House Terrace, London, SW1Y 5AN, UK

The Flin Flon Belt in northern Canada is one of the largest Palaeoproterozoic volcanic-hosted massive sulphide (VHMS) districts in the world, but up to 20 000 km² of prospective Palaeoproterozoic basement south of this belt is buried beneath 10 to 100 m of Phanerozoic calcareous cover. The recent acquisition of airborne SPECTREM geophysics data south of the Flin Flon Belt has resulted in the discovery of Cu-Zn sulphide prospects comprising pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite and galena, but numerous barren Fe sulphide occurrences comprising only pyrite and pyrrhotite have also been intersected. The problem for explorers is trying to determine whether a barren Fe sulphide intersection that has just been cored is part of a larger Cu-Zn mineralized system, or nothing more than a pyrite–pyrrhotite occurrence.

A sulphur isotope study of sulphides from the Flin Flon–Snow Lake–Hargrave River–Talbot area shows that sulphides from the Cu-Zn VHMS deposits have ³⁴S values that range between –1.4 and 6.4, with a mean ³⁴S value of 1.6 ± 1.7 (2 error). More than 95% of these samples have ³⁴S values of <3.3. In contrast, pyrite and pyrrhotite separates from barren Fe sulphide deposits have ³⁴S values between 1.8 and 10.0, with a mean ³⁴S value of 4.3 ± 1.8 (2 error). In this case, >84% of these samples have ³⁴S values of >3.3. The results imply that the barren Fe sulphide deposits can be statistically distinguished from Cu-Zn VHMS mineralization based on S isotopic composition, which should make future exploration drilling decisions easier.

KEYWORDS: ³⁴S-isotopes, copper, zinc, Flin Flon, Snow Lake, Harmin, Talbot, Osborne, exploration