Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lima, A. Articles by Cicchella, D. Search for Related Content

Interpolation methods for geochemical maps: a comparative study using arsenic data from European stream waters

¹ Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Napoli, Italy *(anlima{at}unina.it)
² Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK
³ Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland
⁴ Dipartimento di Studi Geologici ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi del Sannio, Benevento, Italy

A geochemical map of As in water from the FOREGS Geochemical Atlas of Europe, performed using the Alkemia interpolation method based on moving weighted median (MWM), and a comparable map prepared by kriging are compared with an As map prepared with a new multifractal inverse distance weighted (MIDW) interpolation method using GeoDas^TM software. The colour scale classification of the MIDW interpolated map of As is based on the concentration–area (C-A) fractal method which allows images to be subdivided into components representing specific features on the ground related, for example, to geology.

Conventional techniques, such as MWM and kriging, are shown to smooth out the local variability of the geochemical data. The problem is most serious in maps prepared by kriging which erroneously show large areas of Europe to have high levels of As in water. On the other hand, MIDW creates a geochemical map in which information about the local data structure is retained. This is essential in distinguishing anomalies from background values. The information provided by background and anomaly maps, using the MIDW and fractal filtering methods, are shown to give more reliable upper limits of background values.

KEYWORDS: geochemical map, multifractal interpolation, fractal filtering, kriging

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. De Vivo, A. Lima, M. A. Bove, S. Albanese, D. Cicchella, G. Sabatini, L. A. Di Lella, G. Protano, F. Riccobono, P. Frizzo, et al. Environmental geochemical maps of Italy from the FOREGS database Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, November 1, 2008; 8(3-4): 267 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Cicchella, B. De Vivo, A. Lima, S. Albanese, and L. Fedele Urban geochemical mapping in the Campania region (Italy) Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 19 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]